President Trump Spurns Gay Pride Month

More excellent news. President Trump has refused to designate June as LGBT Pride month, a custom established by Barack Obama.

The President did not not issue any “gay pride” declaration, in the beginning of June. Instead, on May 31st he  issued five separate proclamations recognizing June as National Caribbean-American Heritage Month, African-American Music Appreciation Month, National Homeownership Month, Great Outdoors Month and National Ocean Month. LGBT Pride was conspicuously absent!

Nice one, Donald.

Image result for Trump Melania together

Comically, some LGBTs complained that the President was “breaking with tradition”. Funny, they never hesitated to trample on every civilized tradition in society!

Barack Obama (rumoured to have been homosexual himself in his college days and for quite a while afterwards) lit up the White House in rainbow colours to “celebrate” the occasion. President Trump has got better taste and better judgement.

We applaud him for his brave stance upholding common sense, decent morals, health, and the cause of sanity. Even religious freedom is at stake. Thank you, Sir, for not siding with the horrible “gay” bullies.

Any official state celebrations go against the recommendation of a coalition of conservative leaders, who on May 16 called on the Trump administration to “discontinue funding and directing personnel resources for special-interest events, including LGBT-Pride Month events in June, which do not strengthen military readiness.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Victory for Scott Lively

Fantastic news. A court in Massachusetts has rejected the case brought against Rev. Scott Lively by an extremist militant LGBT group.

“SMUG” (Sexual Minorities Uganda) attacked and harrassed Rev. Lively by bringing a preposterous charge that in opposing the promotion of homosexuality he was guilty of “crimes against humanity”, a charge invented for the perpetrators of Nazi genocide. If he had lost, Rev Lively stood to lose upwards of $5 million, the amount of legal fees that SMUG had run up by paying a team of fourteen lawyers to work on the case for four years, plus an indefinite amount of money they were demanding in “damages” for supposed harm to their clients. The full bill could have come to $10 million. 

The case has dragged on for four years, subjecting him and his family to a long and highly stressful ordeal. He was subjected to lies and blamed for the murder of the activist David Kato whose death (at the hands of a male prostitute he had exploited) had nothing to do with so-called “homophobia”.

While the judge, Michael Ponsor, clearly had no time for the Christian point of view and openly sympathized with the LGBT ideology, Lively was skillfully defended by the lawyers of Liberty Counsel, who argued that the US court had no powers to uphold any claim brought by a group in Uganda. SMUG was of course set up as a puppet by devious USA LGBT extremists, in order to use it as a weapon to attack conservatives and Christians. Judge Ponsor should have thrown the case out four years ago, and had a chance to do so.  At least he did so in the end, and dismissed the case.

Attorneys Horatio Mihet and Roger Gannam with Scott Lively

It’s great news, and another hopeful sign that the wind is changing and the era of President Trump will be fairer for everyone, especially Christians targeted by aggressive LGBT bullying. 

Rev Lively has escaped the worst but this will not be justice until he is awarded substantial damages by the US courts for vexatious harassment. He certainly is owed $ millions and so are all those bullied by the Gaystapo.

If anyone is guilty of genocide, it is surely the LGBTs who have spread epidemics that are still killing millions of people worldwide.

Victory for American Pastor Falsely Accused of ‘Crimes Against Humanity’

Jun 6, 2017

SPRINGFIELD, MA – Late yesterday, Liberty Counsel client and American pastor Scott Lively won summary judgment against the foreign LGBT activists, Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG), which sued Lively for sharing his biblical views on homosexuality during three visits to Uganda in 2002 and 2009. The summary judgment order, entered by U.S. District Judge Michael A. Ponsor, puts an end to SMUG’s attempt to silence Lively and others who speak internationally about the LGBT agenda.
SMUG is represented by the Center for Constitutional Rights, which has received funding from George Soros. CCR is located at 666 Broadway in New York, an apt address for such an organization that attempts to use international law to silence people of faith and attack Israeli government officials.
In a direct challenge to the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law, SMUG tried to create new and dangerous precedent using international “crimes against humanity”—akin to genocide and war crimes—by relying on the obscure Alien Tort Statute (ATS). In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court issued the deathblow to SMUG’s lawsuit by ruling that the ATS was never intended to allow a foreign citizen to sue a U.S. citizen in America alleging violation of some supposed international law. Scores of pending cases around the country were dismissed following the 2013 Supreme Court ruling in Kiobel, but the one not dismissed was the SMUG case. Judge Ponsor has a long history of support for the LGBT agenda and said he considers judges “the unappointed legislators of mankind.” Instead of dismissing the case in 2013, as it should have been, Ponsor opened the door for extensive and needless discovery.
Although Judge Ponsor’s order dismissed the case in 2017, for the same reasons he should have dismissed it in 2013 based on the Supreme Court precedent, he let his personal bias against pro-family values and support of the LGBT agenda slip into what should otherwise have been a straight legal opinion. Legally, Judge Ponsor had no choice on the law. The Supreme Court had clearly spoken. But what he did in his opinion is unbecoming by hurling names at Pastor Lively. None of the evidence supports any of the allegations.
After Judge Ponsor refused to dismiss the case in 2013, thousands of hours later, including 100 hours of depositions, and 40,000 pages of documents, SMUG failed to produce a shred of evidence of any conspiracy or persecution by Lively. Rather, the evidence showed that Lively, in a country where homosexuality has been illegal for decades, urged treatment of LGBT people with respect and dignity, and the liberalization of Uganda’s laws against homosexuality, even as he spoke in favor of biblical sexual morality and against the LGBT political agenda.
“This is a victory for the Constitution and the rule of law,” said Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel, “and all Christians should celebrate the end of a lawsuit intended only to intimidate an innocent pastor into silence. But the court’s open display of activism in deriding Lively’s beliefs reminds us of the threats American Christians continue to face from a judiciary that is increasingly hostile to any expression of biblical truth to a decaying culture,” said Staver.
“Once Judge Ponsor properly concluded that he had no jurisdiction over SMUG’s concocted claims, his only duty was to dismiss the case and send SMUG back to Uganda the same way it came—empty- handed,” added Horatio Mihet, Liberty Counsel’s Vice President of Legal Affairs and Chief Litigation Counsel. “Judge Ponsor was without any authority—constitutional, legal, or otherwise—to showcase his contempt for the family values advocated by Scott Lively. Judge Ponsor’s misinformed opinions about Scott Lively are not worth the paper they are written on,” said Mihet.

Pastor Lively commented: “I thank God for His deliverance from this outrageous and malicious litigation, designed solely to silence my voice for biblical truth on LGBT issues and to cause me pain and suffering for daring to speak against the ‘gay’ agenda. I also thank Mat Staver and my Christian attorneys at Liberty Counsel, especially Horatio Mihet and Roger Gannam, who took on and defeated SMUG’s team of 14 lawyers with exemplary skill and fortitude.” And, he continued, “I thank Judge Michael Ponsor, as well, for overcoming his clear ideological bias enough to acknowledge the legal deficiency of SMUG’s case and bring it to a close – even though he had the option four years ago to dismiss this case following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that slammed the door shut on SMUG’S specious legal reasoning.”

Liberty Counsel is an international nonprofit, litigation, education, and policy organization dedicated to advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of life, and the family since 1989, by providing pro bono assistance and representation on these and related topics.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Lesbian Couple Starved Daughter and Hit her with Hammer


Court heard that the abuse had taken place over a number of years with victim revealing she was told ‘they would find me and kill me’

A MUM and her lover have been caged for abusing her starving daughter who they forced to cut the grass at night with scissors and hit with a hammer for stealing food.

Deborah Harrison, 37, and “wife” Jennifer Harrison, 30, hit Deborah’s teenage daughter with a hammer 34 times in what a Judge at Hull Crown Court called “the worst case of actual bodily harm” he had ever dealt with.

Deborah Harrison, left, and Jennifer Harrison have both been sentenced to four years behind bars

The court heard that the abuse had taken place over a number of years and when examined by a doctor days after an attack the victim had bruises all over her head and body.

In a statement she said that after she was forced to leave the home, she was told “no matter where I was, they would find me and kill me.”

Reading out the statement to the court, prosecutor David Gordon said: “I had never felt so much like a child or an animal.

“You have screamed my name so many times that I now hate the sound of my own name.

“I wanted this trial for validation that what I went through is wrong. My life has been held in limbo – I have changed beyond recognition.”

Deborah and Jennifer were both found guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm after a court heard their victim was also beaten with hairbrushes and a TV remote as well as being made to sleep on the floor with dogs.

Caging both women for four years Judge Simon Jack said: “You [Deborah] were her birth mother and should have been protecting her, instead you did the exact opposite.

“It is hard to imagine an offence more serious than that.”

He added: “The victim is not to blame for any of this, it is you who are wholly and solely to blame for this.

“In terms of abuse of trust, it could hardly be worse in this case.

“There could hardly be more aggravating features or a worse outcome.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Donor-Conceived Children of Homosexuals Suffer

People tend to forget that behind the smiley-trendy image of “gay marriage” there is an ugly reality of test-tube babies bred in laboratories like rats, and children being brought up told “you’ve got two Mummies” or “you’ve got two Daddies” or “you’ve got three – or four, or five – parents”.  The reason they’ve got “two Mummies” is that Mummy prefers to go to bed with another woman, and puts her sexual preference BEFORE a child’s need for a father. And the reason they’ve got “two Daddies” is because Daddy prefers going to bed with another man. So he has deliberately deprived that child of a mother.  Their values are sex-centred and self-centred…NOT child-centred or family-centred.

Homosexuals will loudly proclaim that their children are perfectly happy, well-adjusted paragons, because that suits their agenda. But when you ask the children themselves, you get a very different picture. All say how difficult it is to tell their parents they feel uncomfortable about being the poster-children for LGBT “rights”.

Study the Studies- What We Know About Same-Sex Parenting is a worldview wrecking ball for the “all children need is love” crowd. We received some objections within a few hours of publishing Study the Studies from those who felt that the poor outcomes reflected in research on gay parenting can be chalked up to the trauma that kids suffer in the wake of their heterosexual parent’s divorce. No doubt. Divorce is traumatic, and children’s long-term suffering is the result.

This pro-same sex parenting worldview often sees third-party reproduction as the “trauma free” option for gay couples who desire children.  Unfortunately, donor-conceived children are also more likely to struggle than their peers.  They are at increased risk of delinquency, substance abuse, and depression. Many report mistrust of family members and they are haunted by the ever-present specter of the circumstances of their conception. Unlike children of divorce, they are more likely to struggle with questions of their identity. Donor conceived children are also more likely to experience family disruption… and divorce.

There is no “trauma-free” way to deny children a relationship with their mother or father. Divorce and donor-conception are just different paths to brokenness.

You need not take my word for it, you can read the painful truth for yourself. Below are some excerpts from donor-conceived children living with lesbian and gay parents sharing how their conception and household structure has impacted them.

I have two moms and am constantly wondering what it would be like to have a father and who my biological dad is. I’m wondering is there any way to find who he is? im not expecting him to jump and and be some sort of active dad to me i just want to know who he is…

Father’s Day sucks, and my mom thinks its society when really it’s just her. I love her but yeesh. She talks about genders like they don’t matter when raising kids. If they don’t why does she wants me to spend so much time with her guy friends so I can have a father-figure? (JK as if her guy friends love me or relate to me as much as they love and relate with their actual children. Yeah right) … I want to know who my dad is, and a donor# and some basic layout isn’t going to cut it. I need to KNOW him. I need to bond with him and do daddy-daughter things. He’s half of who I am… We’re flesh and blood. He’s literally IN my DNA. Why don’t people get that? If he and my mom were a couple, he’d be my dad. But when my mom ia gay and asked him not to be there, he’s just my ‘donor’? Really? Where is my say in this?

I’m a 15 year old girl and I have two moms. They’re wonderful and the best parents my sister and i could have asked for. But still, I want a dad. I’m not saying that I’m against gay marriage or gay parenting. I just want a dad, and I feel bad for saying that.

I don’t really know if people understand how kick-ass it is that moms like mine had the strength to bring a child into this world on their own. You know, at first, that’s the only way I would look at my situation, that way things were more positive. But in reality, my kick-ass mom never knew and never will know the damage that not having a father has caused me.

I am an only child who lives with my single lesbian mother. I never really even had a father figure in my life, I was always surrounded by my mother’s friends. I always thought it was sort of selfish of my mother to just one day decide she wanted to have a kid. We frequently talk openly about our situation but she never mentioned her thought process or what persuaded her to bring a child into the world. It angers me because I feel like a missed out on so many opportunities that children with fathers have. The thought of not having anyone to walk me down the aisle when I get married haunts me daily…  Growing up without a father sucks. I can’t really have this conversation with my mom without hurting her. If my mom and I ever have a disagreement I have no one else to talk to. I feel so alone. I feel like I have missed out on all of the little things, like having your dad give you piggy backs or teaching me how to ride a bike or getting over protective when I show an interest in boys. I don’t miss my donor personally, i mourn the loss of a childhood without a dad.

All my moms want is to have a baby, and have a biological family like everyone else. So I always thought what a terrible bitch (yes bitch) I am to destroy their happiness too, because I wished I just had a dad in my life and not a donor fake uncle. You have no idea how lonely and guilty I feel about this, but maybe you do? I feel like a bad child, especially when I look on TV and I see the good kids of gay parents say they have the perfect family and they don’t need a mom or dad, but you’re all like ‘but I want a dad…sometimes?’

I am the daughter (not biological) of two moms. I love them both sooo sooo much but there is not a day that goes by that i didn’t wish i had a dad. it is very hard for kids like me that are different. no matter how accetping society is. i have men in my life my moms’ friends but it is not the same. I love my parents but I don’t agree with the fact that I will never know half of my biology or my siblings. I will never do that to a child. If I can’t have them, I will adopt. I hope more couples, gay and straight, consider adoption and foster care.

Short story. I was raised by lesbians, etc. Never really bugged me. Never wanted to meet my “real” dad. I stumbled on this site and was shocked to discover that like 80% of sperm donor kids want to meet their real dad. I still don’t really get why. I think that’s strange. Do you think he has answers for you? Will he tell you who you are… One day I saw a news article about this total douche who contaminated sperm samples around the time I was born. Smart dude, but mentally unstable and an unethical fruitcake. I thought it was funny, did some digging. Guess who is very likely my dad?? Fuck my life. As soon as I began to realize that this dude was probably my dad, I immediately shut the webpage, deleted my search history, ran around the block and did an active meditation to clear all the info from my mind so I would forget. But I can’t unlearn the info. Now that ass-hat is in my brain, and I never wanted to know.

My Moms always made a good image. Smile everybody and pertend to be happy that was our family motto. But I didnt feel happy every time I came home from a friends house and saw how diffrent it was in their homes. My best friends dad was the greatest guy he was funny and nice and always taking us places. He listened to us. I was jealous of my friend and wrote the word Daddy on a peice of paper and put it under my pillow. I wanted a Daddy like my friend had. My friends family all knew how much I liked their Dad cuz I was always asking if I could help him. One day my friends mom asks me are you a Daddys Girl? It means you are the kind of girl who realy loves her Daddy and is real close to him. Well I went home and cried becuz I dont have that and never will know what thats like.

My biological mother was bisexual, and at the time of my conception she was in a relationship with another woman. They couldn’t afford to conceive me through a clinic, so they made private arrangements with my non-biological mother’s nephew and he donated the sperm which conceived me, making me related to both of my mums. Their relationship ended a year after I was born, and in my early years I lived with my biological mother but had regular contact with my other mum and I moved in with her through my teen years and I still live with her to this day… I do have contact with my biological father’s sister and my cousin (who I am quite close to and my paternal aunt is best friends with my biological mum) but most of his family have declined to have contact with me, which I did find quite upsetting at first… I’m 19 and I’ve never made any attempts to contact him out of respect for that arrangement. Maybe someday I will change my mind or he may decide to contact me but I’m leaving that up to him to decide…

Am I the only one who feels this way? Am I a bad daughter because I wish I had a Dad? Is there anyone else who has 2 Moms or 2 Dads who wonders what it would be like if they were born into a normal family? Is ther anyone else who wants to be able to use the word normal without gettin a lecture on what is normal??? I dont know my real father and never will. Its weird but I miss him. I miss this man I will never know. Is it wrong for me to long for a father like my friends have? She has two brothers I play basketball with all the time. It feels so amazing to be included in their family. When I am there I think this is what its like to be in a family that has a Mom and a Dad.

I am also an atheist raised by a gay couple. “homosexual parents are just as capable of raising children as straight parents are” Now I don’t believe that’s true, not even for a second. You can disagree with me. I use to believe that my childhood had nothing to do with my mental illness as a teen, now I know that it was the direct cause of how it began for me. I had experience childhood trauma and repressed it from not really having a mother and being putting odd family structure of having two dad which I think is worse than having two moms tbh I felt abandoned. I was raised with my two brothers, but one later committed suicide in 2014. I just can’t believe that homosexuals are better or as good as straights because mental illness is such a problem within their community not that having a mental issues automatically makes you a bad parent but it does affect your ability to function and make rational decisions. I actually do believe that homosexuality in its self is a mental issues, but I’m not going to go there because that’s going to offend a lot of people. in fact I’m just going to end it there full stop because I’m not good and expressing myself in the right way and my English is very bad.

I’m female and 16-ish. I have gay moms (well had, they’re divorced and remarried, but they’re still cool and all). They wanted to basically pretend (in a sense?) they had a biological child together since it’s impossible for gay couples to have kids. So they asked my uncle (father?) for sperm and he donated. I always knew I came from donated sperm, but I thought (hoped) it was some stranger or something , so then I could find him, meet him, and seek him for mentorship from him in my college years. And it can be like when adoptees meet their birth parents. I had no idea it was a relative. When I asked my mom for info about my donor, she said it was. It feels weird and incestuous and NOT cool. My mom tried to make it seem “cool” but it just seems wrong and gross. Who the hell does this? Just ew. How could he just pretend I wasn’t his? We have family reunions and stuff, and he just calls me “niece”. I’m his daughter. How can people just pretend their kids aren’t theirs when they decide they don’t want them? Is that how it works now? ‘Oh I got some half-babies left, let me just give them away to this person’. What the hell!

I am a only child and daughter of two lesbian mothers, although me and my biological mum move away when I was about 6. Both my parents were very open to me from a young age about how I was born, although I never really questioned it until I moved to a more conservative area, where every kid had a mommy and a daddy and lots of my friends found it strange when I told them I didn’t have a dad. When I was really little I spread a story about how he was brutally murdered in a forest, which obviously sounded stupid as we all grew up. As I moved up into middle school and high school my friends seemed so..sympathetic that I didn’t have a dad! They would say things like “Oh! I’m so sorry..” and, “That must be so hard.” As a teenager I was now questioning my history, the way I was brought up. When I was younger I always didn’t care, who needed a dad?? I never knew him..don’t want to know him! But now I feel like I should care, and I really wish I don’t! I’m not about to go hunt him down or anything, because at the end of the day he isn’t really my dad, just my biological father. But I do however wonder if maybe I missed out on something.

I have two moms and it sucks. My dad was a donor and I’ll probably never meet him. Anyways, I’m now at the age where it really sucks to be the only guy in my house (I have a sister along with my two moms). Oh, also, they’ve been divorced since I was three and still don’t get along. Neither of them understand how to give me some space every now and then. They don’t get it when I just want to hang out with my friends and not with them all the time. Honestly, I hate it. I hate everything about not having a dad or at least a brother in my family. Even if my sister was even a little fun to be around, it would be better. I have nothing in common with her, and even less with her birth mom who I do not get along with at all. If it was just me and my birth mom I’d be a lot happier. She is the only one in my family who really cares about me and who really likes having me around and I like being around. My other mom’s side of the family is so cynical and mean to each other, and just being over at her house gives me bad vibes.

I know nothing about my dad. And for some reason the past 3 years that’s all that’s been on my mind. Its getting worse, that its to the point where any older man I look at I day dream about. I even write stories about it, or even rewrite books that have to do with father and daughter stuff. I know I must sound crazy to you guys but I just cant help feeling that way. I’ve seen “What a girl wants” so many times I know all the scenes and the words to the whole movie. It doesn’t help any that my mom is gay, and freaks out every time I try to bring it up. She wont tell me anything about him. Its like she wants to be my dad, and she wants her girlfriend to be my mom, they want to be this big happy family. But we cant because its wrong, it even feels wrong. I want my mom to be the person I talk to with boys not the one to hate them. I want her to wear dresses and date guys. I want a father figure that is a guy not a woman. Please help me anyone.

It’s almost 1 am and can’t stop thinking about all the family I have out there 6 brothers 6 sisters 1 dad I may never know. I have the paper work I know my donor number my mom had kept nothing from me but still that’s all I know. I payed $75 dollars out of my less than $10 salary for the sibling donor registry and nothing. It’s only been 2 months but the membership only lasts a year. I tell my self I just want to know something but that’s a lie I know allot of somethings, more than many. What I really want is to find a sibling who knows what I’m going through. I feel like my priority should be my donor but it’s not I grew up with 2 moms and 1 brother now it’s just the 1 mom, the idea of a father is a forien concept. All I have from him is half my Dna 12 siblings and the words “I hope your child will be a free-thinker and a free-feeler as I have preserved to be”.

Hi . . . I’m a boy of 14. I live with 2 dads . . . one of them is my biological dad and one of them isn’t. My biological mother (who gave my dads her ovum for my birth . . .) comes my house often. She’s 38 and my dads’ long time best friend . . . I want to call her my mom but my dads always get mad when I try . . . actually I’ve already call her mom when my dads are not around and she liked it . . . she and I have lots of connections with each other . . .

I am a donor-conceived child of lesbian parents. I stand here with the support of all three of my parents. This is a testimony that it is, safe to say, unheard of because nobody wants to hear about the other side of the rainbow. . . Growing up, I wanted a father…. I felt it within me that I was missing a father before I could even articulate what a father was. I knew that I loved both of my parents, but I could not place my finger on what it is I was missing inside myself.  When I hit school I started to realize through observing other children and their loving bonds with their fathers and I was missing out on something special.  I was lied to throughout school; I was told I didn’t have a father. . .it was very difficult for me to affirm a stable identity because of this. And my behavioral and emotional stability suffered greatly because of it… –Millie Fontana



The trauma of a previous heterosexual divorce cannot explain away the diminished outcomes for kids with LGBT parents given that donor-conceived children of gay parents weren’t born from family disruption (though they often experienced it anyway). Yet, they still struggle with many of the same, if not more, emotional issues as children of divorce.

The obvious explanation for why kids with same-sex parents suffer isn’t politically correct- it’s just correct: children have a right to both their mother and father and suffer (regardless of the method) when that right is denied.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Great News – US court excludes “sexual orientation” from discrimination laws.

Excellent news. A court in Virginia, USA, has had the guts to return to the true meaning of the anti-discrimination laws passed in the 1970s.

Over the past few years, US courts have WRONGLY determined that laws which specified no discrimination on grounds of “sex” also covered “sexual orientation”. meaning homosexuality.  That is just not true. So-called “sexual orientation” is not a sex, it is just a form of behaviour. No one has the right to behave just as they please, where, when and how they please, and impose that on other people regardless of the outcome. Other people have a right to their feelings, their privacy, their choices, and their moral viewpoint. 

YGB says : This excellent court verdict is another hopeful sign that the tide is turning in America and the era of sleaze and madness under Obama is coming to a close.

II, Elizabeth D. Walker and Margaret L. Workman.


West Virginia court excludes ‘sexual orientation’ from anti-discrimination laws

Fr. Mark Hodges

CHARLESTON, West Virginia, May 16, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — The West Virginia Supreme Court has ruled that laws against discrimination on the basis of a person’s sex do not include “sexual orientation.”

The 3-2 decision upholds an originalist view of legislation whereby the judicial system interprets the intent of law and does not legislate from the bench.

Chief Justice Allen H. Loughry II delivered the ruling Saturday, which determined that “where the language of a statute is clear and without ambiguity, the plain meaning is to be accepted.” The ruling takes a strict constructionist view of law, which strikes at the heart of attempts to expand old laws to create a special class of “hate crimes.”

At issue was a 1987 state civil rights law (WV Code 61-6-21b) that prohibited discrimination on the basis of various characteristics, including “sex.”

“The West Virginia Supreme Court’s decision yesterday was a victory for common sense,” the Family Council of West Virginia (FCWV) posted on Facebook. “It will halt some of the biological heresy that left-leaning legislators have been attempting to pass that would give legal status to more than two genders.”

“George Orwell’s dystopian novel titled ‘1984’ depicts a world full of fear and intimidation where the government can permanently redact its citizens for merely thinking the wrong thing,” the FCWV continued. “Congress was frighteningly misguided when they codified the concept that some illegal acts, now labeled ‘hate crimes,’ should be punished more severely because of what the criminal may have been thinking at the time. This politically correct Group-Think has always been wrong-headed, and threatens commonsense liberties of West Virginia citizens exactly the same way that Orwell’s thought police punished people in his novel.”

The State of West Virginia v. Butler came about after Steward Butler punched two men openly kissing in public in 2015. He was charged and convicted of two counts of assault and battery, but he was also charged and convicted of two counts of violating the homosexuals’ civil rights under the 1987 law.

Butler accepted his punishment for punching the men but appealed the special civil rights discrimination convictions.

That the 1987 law intended “sex” discrimination to mean the binary genders male and female was not disputed. The State instead argued that the court should disregard the “literal sense of the words” in the statute and apply “sex” to include sexual orientation.

Republican West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey filed a “friend of the court” brief supporting the constructionist view. Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund submitted a brief supporting the state’s view.

In the end, the state Supreme Court affirmed a circuit court’s ruling that the 1987 anti-discrimination law was “unambiguous.” Noting that sex and sexual orientation have quite different meanings, the court verified that justices are “bound to apply the law as it stands” and “cannot expand the word ‘sex’ to include ‘sexual orientation’ within West Virginia Code § 61-6-21(b).”

Citing several previous rulings, the state Supreme Court affirmed:

  • “This Court does not sit as a super-legislature, commissioned to pass upon the political, social, economic or scientific merits of statutes pertaining to proper subjects of legislation.” (from a 2009 ruling)
  • “Courts must presume that a legislature says in a statute what it means and means in a statute what it says.” (2017 ruling)
  • “It is not for this Court arbitrarily to read into a statute that which it does not say. Just as courts are not to eliminate through judicial interpretation words that were purposely included, we are obliged not to add to statutes something the Legislature purposely omitted.” (1994 and 2013 rulings)
  • “Courts are not free to read into the language what is not there, but rather should apply the statute as written.” (2015)
  • “Judicial challenge ‘is not a license for [this Court] to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic of legislative choices.’“ (2011)

The majority opinion also included references that tempered its ruling as one against judicial activism and not against anti-discrimination laws:

  • This decision is “not to be construed as a final adjudication of the questions presented” (from a 1937 state ruling)
  • This ruling “is neither an express nor an implicit ruling on the merits of the legal issue presented.”
  • “We do not comment on whether it would be good or bad policy for the Legislature to amend West Virginia Code § 61-6-21 to include sexual orientation.”

The court left Butler’s two battery convictions standing.

This West Virginia ruling is the exact opposite of a Chicago appeals court ruling on April 4 that Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bans discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin, also covers homosexuality.

Two of the three women on the five-member West Virginia Supreme Court, Justices Robin Jean Davis and Margaret L. Workman, dissented. Their written dissent extensively quoted the Chicago appellate court’s redefining of “sex” not as one’s binary gender but as including expected gender roles versus homosexual activity [which is complete rubbish!].

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Australian “Gay marriage” crusader is criminal wanted on child porn charges

The fugitive Matthew Hynd with his lover Ali Choudhry in 2013.

Matthew Hynd, who made headlines in Australia as a supporter of gay marriage, was a fugitive from justice, wanted in the United States on child pornography charges. Hynd was sentenced to more than six years in federal prison earlier this month, after having been deported last year from Australia, where he had started a business and, along with his Pakistani boyfriend, campaigned for gay rights.
“In 2010, while Hynd was living and working in Albany, FBI Agents executed a search warrant on his home, after Hynd distributed child pornography images over the Internet,” the U.S. Department of Justice said in a press release. “Agents found hundreds of images of child pornography on Hynd’s computers. Hynd then fled the United States and returned to his native Australia.”
Hynd had been a professor at New York’s SUNY Albany Colleges of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, but became addicted to both methamphetamine and child pornography, his lawyer told Judge Mae D’Agostino at a May 3 sentencing hearing. U.S. prosecutors described Hind as “manipulative and attempting to falsely blame a friend for the child pornography,” according to the Australian News website:
Three days after the search warrant was executed [in 2010], Hynd bought an airline ticket to fly from New York to Casablanca, Morocco, and the next day he boarded the flight.
He left his job in Albany without providing notice to his employer and prosecutors said flight records showed Hynd “travelled around the world before landing in Australia, where he is a citizen”.
Hynd was indicted in the US in 2012, extradited from Australia in August 2015, and entered guilty pleas to distribution and possession of child pornography charges. . . .
Judge D’Agostino ordered Hynd also serve a lifetime term of supervised release after he leaves jail and to pay $US1000 in restitution to one of his child pornography victims.
However, as activist Luke McKee reported on his @VGB_OPSEC Twitter account, Hynd had become something of an LGBT celebrity while a fugitive in Australia. In March 2012, he and his lover Ali Choudhry were featured in a profile story in the Brisbane Courier-Mail after they were granted a civil union license in Queensland, which was voided in a controversial act by the province’s conservative government.

The couple later made news because Choudhry, who had come to Australia on a student visa in 2009, was facing deportation to his native Pakistan. In a 2013 profile at the Australian LGBT site Same Same, Choudry described how he met Hynd:

As with all great modern romances we met online, in February 2010. I was studying in Australia and Matt was working with the New York State Department of Health. Over the next few months we spoke on the phone, texted and Skyped — which is harder than it sounds because of the 14-hour time difference.
In August of 2010, Matt came on a holiday back to Australia where we were able to finally meet in person. We knew right then and there that it was meant to be. After a lot of thought, Matt quit his job and moved to Australia in December 2010. On February 13, 2014 we will celebrate our four-year anniversary.

Choudhry’s claim that Hynd came to Australia “on a holiday” when, in fact, the professor was fleeing federal charges in the U.S., raises the question of whether Choudhry knew of Hynd’s interest in child pornography, and possibly shared it, since their online “romance” occurred during the months immediately preceding the search warrant that prompted Hynd’s flight. Yet the fact that Hynd had been indicted in the U.S. was not known to the Australian LGBT activists who supported an online fundraising appeal Choudhry and Hynd made in 2013:

That appeal (“Support Love – A Gay Love Story”) raised more than $6,000 — easily doubling their original goal — and in 2014, Choudhry was granted an extension on his visa. Meanwhile, Hynd had started a business, Slurp Tea, that got publicity in Brisbane media:

The report of Matthew Hynd’s sentencing in the Courier-Mail this month made no reference to his high-profile past as “Chief Tea Guru” and a prominent gay-rights activist widely covered in Australian media.

Nor is this the first time Australia’s media has promoted pedophiles in the name of gay rights. In 2010, the Australian Broadcasting Company featured a story headlined “Two Dads Are Better Than One” about Peter Truong and Mark Newton, who said their son was conceived in 2005 with the assistance of a Russian surrogate mother. Three years later, however, Truong and Newton were convicted of sexually exploiting the boy:

Police believe the pair had adopted the boy “for the sole purpose of exploitation.” The abuse began just days after his birth and over six years the couple travelled the world, offering him up for sex with at least eight men, recording the abuse and uploading the footage to an international syndicate known as the Boy Lovers Network.

Another prominent gay activist, former University of Southern California Professor Walter Lee Williams, was sentenced to five years in prison in 2014 for “flying to the Philippines and sexually assaulting underage boys he had met online.” Williams had been a fugitive in Mexico but was apprehended in 2013 after being named to the FBI’s Most Wanted List:

Recognition for Williams’ educational work included the USC General Education Outstanding Teacher Award in 2006. But his academic work was a cover for his criminal activity, according to prosecutors.
Williams taught anthropology, gender studies and history at USC for about two decades until he quit in 2011. Under the guise of academic research on sexuality in the Southeast Asia/Pacific region, he repeatedly traveled to the area, prosecutors said.
Federal prosecutors alleged that the author and Fulbright Award winner used those trips to sexually assault underage boys. Investigators believe he has at least 10 victims across Southeast Asia, aged 9 to 17.
Williams engaged in Webcam sex sessions with two boys, aged 13 and 14, in the Philippines in 2010, prosecutors alleged. The next year, he traveled to the country and sexually assaulted both boys and a 15-year-old boy, according to the plea agreement.
While there, he also had sexual contact with three other 16-year-old boys, records show. When he returned to Los Angeles International Airport on Feb. 11, 2011, he was stopped and child pornography was found on him.
The professor fled Los Angeles a week after being interviewed by the FBI. An attorney for USC last year provided the FBI with materials the professor donated to the ONE National Gay and Lesbian Archives that contained “lascivious visual depictions of minors,” according to the plea agreement.

Professor Williams was co-editor of a 1997 book, Overcoming Heterosexism and Homophobia, and also co-edited the 2003 book Gay and Lesbian Rights in the United States: A Documentary History.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Victory for Hands On Originals Against LGBT bullying in USA

Kentucky Christian Business Owner Scores a Big Win for Religious Liberty

Hands On Originals owner Blaine Adamson

The tide is turning in America  – the Trump era is starting to make difference and restore religious liberties lost under the fool Obama.

People of faith not only have a right to freely express their beliefs, but the government can’t force them to express ideas that are contrary to their deeply held beliefs.

That’s what the Kentucky Court of Appeals decided Friday in the case of a Lexington printer who declined an order that would have forced him to promote a message in conflict with his Christian beliefs. This is the second time Blaine Adamson, owner of Hands On Originals, has successfully defended his rights against the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission.

In 2012, Adamson declined to print shirts with a message promoting the Lexington Pride Festival, an event that the Gay and Lesbian Services Organization hosted. Although he declined to print the shirts because of the message that would have been on them, he nevertheless offered to refer the GLSO to another printer who would have made the shirts. Unsatisfied, the GLSO filed a complaint with the commission—despite eventually receiving the shirts for free from another printer.

In 2014, the commission determined that Adamson must print messages that conflict with his faith when customers ask him to do so. Attorneys with the Alliance Defending Freedom appealed the commission’s order to the Fayette Circuit Court, which reversed the ruling and affirmed Adamson’s religious freedom—but that wasn’t the end of the fight.

The commission appealed the lower court decision to the Kentucky Court of Appeals. It, too, found no reason to support the commission’s decision. The opinion written by Chief Judge Joy A. Kramer found that Adamson did not engage in unlawful discrimination because there was no evidence to demonstrate that he “refused any individual the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages and accommodations it offered to everyone else because the individual in question had a specific sexual orientation or gender identity.” It’s a stupid law and it must not be allowed to trample over all morality and common sense.

In a concurring opinion, Judge Debra Hembree Lambert wrote that Hands On Originals is protected by Kentucky’s Religious Freedom Restoration Statute, and that Adamson has the right under that law to operate his business consistently with his “sincerely held religious beliefs.”

YGB says: Now we want all states to ratify this and courts to order big compensation payouts to anyone who has been the victim of LGBT bullying, from Sweet Cakes to Brendan Eich. 

End all gay bullying now!

http://www.chow we want

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The “Born Gay” Money-Making Fraud – YouTube

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Trump Appoints Religious Liberty Defender Roger Severino Head of Civil Rights

Another nice one! President Trump has chosen Roger Severino to head the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Severino, the former director of the Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society at the Heritage Foundation, has been especially known for his criticism of Obamacare’s crazy inclusion of transgender treatment and surgery as “medical care”. That means that the normal majority who buy medical insurance are compelled to pay for this harmful and non-medical intervention.  Obamacare tyrannically sets out to penalize healthcare professionals who are morally and professionally opposed to sex change surgeries and treatments.

Severino and Ryan Anderson, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, observed in a report in 2016 that Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) provides guidelines that “force many physicians, hospitals, and other health care providers to participate in sex-reassignment surgeries and treatments, even if it violates their religious beliefs or their best medical judgment.”

Roger Severino OCR LGBT

“Moreover, because they apply so broadly, the regulations propose to also force employers, individuals, and taxpayers to fund coverage for such procedures even if doing so conflicts with their sincere beliefs,” Severino and Anderson added.

“It’s a super appointment. Roger Severino is a very balanced thinker who is also an experienced litigator,” said Family Research Council senior fellow Ken Blackwell, according to LifeSiteNews. Blackwell added Severino, who also worked as CEO and legal counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, is “associated with some of the best thinkers in the area of civil rights policy.”

Writing at the Daily Signal last year on the issue of North Carolina’s bathroom privacy policy, Severino asserted, “The radical left is using government power to coerce everyone, including children, into pledging allegiance to a radical new gender ideology over and above their right to privacy, safety, and religious freedom.” Absolutely!  Just what we think. 

LGBT extremists such as HRC criticized Severino’s appointment. GREAT! That proves what a good choice it is. Professionals should always have freedom of conscience to opt out of procedures they do not regard as moral, whether it is a matter of abortion, euthanasia, advice to homosexuals, sex-change treatment etc.

It is good to be able to hope that soon the vast majority of Americans will have REALLY affordable health care without being forced to pay for the demands of disturbed people who are trying to force their delusions  – or aberrations – on others.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Trump Appoints Conservative Army Secretary instead of homosexual

Thank God President Trump has taken over from Obama. He has now selected Senator Mark Green, a Republican from Tennessee, to be the next army secretary.

Not a minute too soon! The crazy policies of LGBT extremists have already done untold damage to the US army. Since openly gay behaviour was legalized there is a rising problem of homosexual rape. Under Obama and his “openly gay” army Secretary, Eric Fanning, the army has degenerated. The queers flaunt their perversions, and try all the time to draw others in. If others don’t join in willingly, they get forced.

Mark Green is a Christian, Tea Party supporter, and sensible conservative with his feet on the ground.  He has championed SB 127, which will end the policy of reprisals against businesses that refuse to employ a statutory quota of homosexuals and trannies. No more Gaystapo telling us who to employ!  The mad policy of letting homosexuals become leaders in the Boy Scouts is only one example of how this leads to disaster.

He has also supported SB 771, which upholds the obligation of schools to provide separate toilet facilities, showers and changing rooms for boys and for girls.  This defends the right of boys and girls to privacy from the opposite sex.  Children  who wish to use the wrong facilities are disturbed and should never be indulged in their delusion.

Green backs SB 14, which would restore to teachers the right not to teach content that violates their conscience. This means they will not have to teach the lies of LGBT propaganda. They would be free again to assert that marriage is the union of a man to a woman, to point out the health risks and abnormality of the “gay” lifestyle, or simply say nothing.  At present teachers are shamefully bullied to implement ideas of GLAAD or HRC. 

Along with SB14 he quite rightly backs  SB 1556, a bill to restore freedom of conscience to those practising psycho-therapy and counselling. That is totally fair, as therapists should certainly not have to encourage patients in disturbed or unhealthy behaviours. Every patient should be entitled to choose a therapist and if what they want is help overcoming or controlling their homosexual urges, that is up to them. The state has no right to interfere, and the Gay Mafia certainly have no right to push their oar in and obstruct. We know from science that nobody is “born gay”. 

Last June, the Pentagon announced that it was abolishing the obligation to correctly state your sex when you serve in the armed forces. It announced that liars and cross-dressers would now be welcome! Was the idea to go into a war aiming to make the enemy die laughing? Luckily there was a year-long timetable for implementing the policy, so that sexually confused people cannot enlist under the wrong sex until this coming summer. Green, who doesn’t hold with any trannie nonsense, can be expected to backtrack and send the nutcases packing. 

We applaud Trump’s choice and hope to see many more like it, pulling America back from the downward spiral it was on during Obama’s presidency.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment