Homosexuals Admit They Have High Rates of Drug Abuse

Homosexuals are not “gay”,  they are disturbed individuals. They themselves admit what the police and medical profession have known for some time, that they are far more likely than average to use psychedelic or recreational drugs. High on the list is “crystal meth” along with cocaine, and party-poppers. All these drugs contribute to homosexuals taking foolish risks in sexual behavior and carrying out assaults, rapes and injury to each other.

Meth addict

LGBT magazines admit “meth use [is] rising among gays in large cities”.  TV reports confirm this. They go to orgies which they call “parties”, and have “chem-sex” because they seek excitement. And then the government expects us, the tax-payer to foot their medical bills and other help. Why?

Many of the pathetic broken people described in these articles are already HIV positive at the age of 17 – typical – and they ignore the fact that it’s the most damaging drug for people with HIV. They ask “why are people still using it?” –  maybe because they are stupid, disturbed or in some way damaged people, is the answer you are looking for. That’s why they become addicts. 

Then they complain about “homophobia” and blame heterosexuals! 

The prevalence of drug-addiction among male homosexuals is one thing that is fuelling the rise and rise of HIV infection. Yes, the epidemic is not going away.  Because while they glorify themselves and complain about prejudice, and get public subsidies to help them with their problems, you still can’t fix STUPID. They are caught in a syndrome of perversion and self-harm.

VGB says : Let their whinging stop. It’s time they took the blame.

 

 

 

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/why-do-gay-men-do-crystal-meth_us_5704023ee4b083f5c60929b5

https://www.queerty.com/whats-behind-the-enduring-allure-of-crystal-meth-for-gay-men-20160405

https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20160201/west-village/meth-is-overlooked-problem-transgender-gay-communities-experts

https://www.channel4.com/news/crystal-meth-hiv-gay-men-london-sex-parties

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Homosexuals Admit They Have High Rates of Drug Abuse

  1. notChristian says:

    Here are things the articles (done by pro-gay/lesbian bias) omit which is no surprise. The sites omit METH rage, Coke rage, etc. Methamphetamines and Cocaine along with other drugs can make 1 strong and violent. Those sites omit that the gay, transexual or some cases lesbian could commit a violent crime or even potentially kill you especially if the homosexual, lesbian or transgender is high on drugs such as Meth, Cocaine, etc. while committing stalking, indecent exposure, etc. Indecent exposure, harassment, stalking, assault & battery can worsen to something more violent if the homosexual, lesbian or transexual is high on drugs such as cocaine, Meth.

    Like

  2. notChristian says:

    Here are 4 comments I made on panic here http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-lgbtq-gay-panic-defense-20171228-story.html on the LA Times.

    1. Yet something else for you Kevin-in this article the LA Times Reporter Jaclyn Michelle Cosgrove write about 28 or so transgenders who were killed in the U.S. in 2017 and she cites the HRC. Among the 28 killed, in 2 cases (1 in Missouri and another in Georgia), the transgenders were shot and killed by the police such as 1 in Missouri where a transgender stabbed a man, had tried to attack a cop and was shot in killed. In the Georgia Tech case, the transgendergay had refused to comply, tried to attack cops and was killed. No surprise that the HRC would make these 2 to be heros.

    But there are so many people killed every year. With violent crimes, there are more cases as mentioned of homosexuals, lesbianns and transgenders taking drugs such as Meth, Cocaine, etc. and then committing violent crimes while under their influence. But these violent crimes committed by homosexuals don’t make usually make the news as reporters usually have a pro-homosexual/lesbian and transgender bias and omit news which doesn’t agree with the journalist’s agenda.

    2. Kevin55, let me give you a case I know from a a few years ago and Kevin55 if you have thoughts then please tell me what you think the man should have done ? Young man was @ a party and the homosexual proposed to him. The man told the homosexual ‘no thanks’ and walked away. This should be the end, but then this happened. The young man got harassing phone calls @ home by who he believes was the homosexual who he told no to. The young man also thinks that the homosexual man had on @least 1 occasion, followed the young man to the college and workplace. 1 day, the young man had some1 ring his door. When the young man opened the door, it was the homosexual man who entered his house and started touching and kissing the young man against his will (assault and battery). After this happened, the young man reacted by bashing the homosexual man.

    The homosexual man in this case committed several crimes-harassment (leaving the obscene phone messages), stalking (following the young man to his workplace and school), stalking/trespassing (entering the young man’s house against will) and assault & battery (kissing the young man against his will and touching him). This young man bashed the homosexual in reaction to crimes the homosexual did. If the young man did not react, he would likely have ended up being violently attacked by the homosexual man. This homosexual had a history of harassing young men and then attacking them when the men refused only in this case, the young man fought back. Under the language of the law, it could be interpreted that this man does not have a right to defend himself against this stalker and would be attacker and the law’s language unsurprisingly has these legal problems, especially as it’s written by gay/lesbian and transgender activists. These cases are not so easy and simple and can be quite complicated and complex.

    3. TruthShines,it’s not so easy and simple as you imply and is more complicated and complex. You could use deadly force to protect yourself from some1 about to violently attack you or about to sexually abuse you, so it’s not just limited to some1 trying to kill you. Yes, proposing straight or gay in a person’s house or bar is legal. The right thing to do is say ‘no thanks’ and walk away. But the law’s language has loopholes as mentioned which could create problems. Here’s another example to prove point.

    There are cases of homosexual men who go into public bathrooms, harass men and teenage boys for sex and then violently attacking the men and boys who refused. The way the law is written, let’s say a homosexual man goes into a public bathroom, commits indecent exposure and starts harassing a teenage boy for sex after which the teenage boy reacts and kills the homosexual. Is it self-defense? If it’s prosecuted, then a jury would decide if justified or excess force was used but things to regard. What if the homosexual man in this case has a history of going into public bathrooms, harassing young men teenage boys for sex and then violently attacking the teenage boys who said no?

    If you’re going to tell me the men and teenage boys should say ‘no’ to a homosexual who is proposing to them in a public bathroom, proposing to people in public bathrooms (straight or homosexual) is a crime-harassment and cops arrest people who do this. There’s no need for a man to say no to a homosexual who is proposing to him in a public bathroom because there’s no need to say no to a crime the other had no right to do. A synonym is if you’re a store owner there is no need to say ‘don’t steal’ because stealing is a crime and no need to say no to a crime the other person has no right to do.

    The homosexual man in that case is committing the crime of indecent exposure and harassment by harassing the teenage boy for sex, but as said -indecent exposure, harassment, stalking, can worsen to something more violent such as rape/sex abuse and if the homosexual, lesbian or transexual is high on drugs such as cocaine, Meth, an even more violent crime. What if the homosexual man in that situation along with having a history of harassing young men for sex and then beating them up when he didn’t get what he wanted is also high on drugs such as Meth or Cocaine? Though you know, these situations are unpredictable. In that situation, a case can be made that the teenage boy by reacting violently against a homosexual who is harassing him in a public bathroom defended himself from a more violent crime the homosexual intended, especially if the homosexual man has a history of attacking young men in public bathrooms after harassing them for sex.

    4. When I read a gay (transexuals are mutilated gays/lesbians and they must abolish sex changes) bashing case in the news, I wonder what the journalist view reporting this on homosexuality/lesbianism ? I also wonder if the journalist is a homosexual or lesbian and if so, are they setting aside their bias and reporting the news with no problems ? I do not trust news that I get from Daily Kos or the Huffington Post on their coverage of gay bashing cases because they predictably make the homosexual look like an innocent victim no matter what wrong the gay does. Here’s what LA Times journalist Jaclyn Michelle Cosgrove left out. Lawrence Fobes King exposed himself and harassed other boys in the bathroom. When complaints were made about Lawrence Fobes King, the lesbian VP Joy Epstein refused to expel him.

    Lawrence Fobes King (Lawrence) harassed Brandon James McInerney (Brandon) by stalking Brandon such as following Brandon wherever Brandon went, even when Brandon asked him to stop following him. An eg. would be Lawrence stalking Brandon as Brandon was playing basketball which witnesses testified to-Brandon did not testify.

    We know what was reported. It can easily be that Lawrence Fobes King (Lawrence) committed violence (assault & battery) against Brandon James McInerney (Brandon), which Brandon did not report. Stalkers can get violent when they don’t get what they want and most stalking does not get reported which Brandon did not report. There could have been incident(s) where Lawrence Fobes King threatened Brandon with a knife or other weapon which Brandon did not report-this would not be surprising. Most abuse goes unreported and it can easily be that Lawrence committed violence against Brandon in addition to stalking. If the school had expelled Lawrence Fobes King when complaints were made, his February 2008 killing would likely not have happened. I think this case was manslaughter.

    Another thing is this law’s language also can possibly create problems for police officers arresting gays, lesbians and transgenders with excess force accusations and here’s how-let’s say that police are arresting a homosexual or transgender who is committing indecent exposure in a bathroom and the homosexual is high on drugs such as Meth, Cocaine, etc., resists arrests and gets wounded by the police after which homosexual says excess force. The way the law’s language is written, it could be interpreted that the police officers could not argue the fact the homosexual was committing indecent exposure while high on drugs as a defense to excess force charges.

    Like

  3. notChristian says:

    In another place this site posted this https://gaybullyingitisreal.wordpress.com/2016/07/20/twitter-silences-milo-yiannopoulos-for-surfing-while-conservative-lets-liberal-trolls-harass-conservative-woman-for-three-years-%E2%8B%86-conservative-firing-line/ You need to update yourself on who Milo is because Milo H. Yiannopolous is a horrible person.

    Milo H. Yiannopolous who this article mentions is an apologist for homosexual pedophiles see this video (warning the language is graphic and gross) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJhHwspZGcg

    Milo H. Yiannopolous is a homosexual and he thinks it’s OK for homosexuals to molest children. Milo Yiannapolous implied that he is OK with adults having sex with teenage boys because as Milo was sexually abused by a priest and this damaged his thinking, he calls it his first sexual encounter to justify in his mind that it’s consent and not sex abuse. This is unsurprising and Milo can’t be trusted.

    You can be sure that Milo does not think that Harvey B. Milk should have been punished for committing homosexual statutory rape on a 16 year old boy in 1964. You can also be sure that Milo Yiannopolous would be against prosecuting Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt- 2013 Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt case in Florida, where a lesbian committed sex abuse on a teenage girl in a public bathroom and homosexual groups were against her being prosecuted for lesbian statutory rape-they even exploited children to rally for her carrying ‘stop the hate’ signs to protest prosecutor.

    If Milo Yiannopolous had not been sexually abused by a priest when he was 13, would he have turned out straight instead of gay? Possible he would have turned out straight but though won’t say definite. It’s not controversial to talk of nightmares, suicides, bed wetting often a result of sex abuse in youth. Yet when 1 talks gay/lesbian behaviors in adulthood because they learned this sexual behavior by being repeatedly molested, then gay groups with politically safe psychologists complain. The politically correct psychologists who deny this know it’s possible for a boy to turn out gay as a result of childhood sex abuse, yet deny what they know is true. Of course, not all who are sexually abused in youth become gay in adulthood-but the risk is higher.

    While most gays and lesbians do not commit pedophilia, I have found that homosexual groups are more likely to tolerate pedophilia when it’s homosexual/lesbian. The fact that Milo would make jokes about his sex abuse by the gay priest makes me think that and his comments do not shock me because have heard this so many times before. Earlier in the post, I mentioned the 2013 Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt case and homosexual icon Harvey Bernard Milk (1930-1978). It’s homosexual groups who often push for lowering consent age laws-many places have lowered consent age laws to 16 and some have even lowered this to 13.

    I have found that homosexual and lesbian groups will often say that they are against pedophilia, but then they make excuses for Harvey B. Milk committing homosexual statutory rape on a 16 year old boy in 1964 and push for trying to lower consent age laws.

    Like

  4. notChristian says:

    Why did this website delete the topic on panic in December 2017? Yes, it’s your site and you have the right to create and delete topics as you want, but why was the December 2017 panic topic deleted by this site?

    But here’s another topic for you and see the excuses made by homosexuals here
    https://www.queerty.com/one-cop-obsessed-luring-gay-men-public-restrooms-arrest-20160803

    See the fact that homosexual posters are making excuses for gays who have sex in public bathrooms. While most homosexuals don’t have sex in public bathrooms and most gays and lesbians do not commit pedophilia, homosexual groups are more likely to tolerate homosexuals having sex in public bathrooms and pedophilia when it’s homosexual/lesbian.

    Here’s another example Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt see this http://www.theblaze.com/news/2013/05/24/theres-a-major-twist-in-the-story-about-a-high-school-students-lesbian-relationship-with-a-minor-as-younger-teens-parents-drop-alleged-bombshell/

    homosexual groups rallied people including children to protest prosecuting Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt who committed lesbian statutory rape on a 14 year old girl. If a man (even 18 years old) were having sex with a 14 year old girl, he usu. goes to jail for statutory rape and be reqd. to register as a sex offender. If a woman had sex with a teenage boy, she could go to jail for stautory rape and yes, cops and prosecutors go after women who do this and women have gone to prison for having sex with teenage boys.

    homosexual groups exploited kids to rally for a lesbian who had sex with a 14 year old girl in a public bathroom and people harassed the victim’s parents for calling the cops. Homosexual groups often have the same view as Milo Yiannopolous has in that if it’s gay/lesbian pedophilia or gay/lesbian statutory rape, then make excuses for that as they did for Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt. For homsexual groups to get children to rally for Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt after she sexually abused this minor girl is wrong-exploiting children for causes.

    This lesbian sexually abused a 14 year old girl in a public bathroom. She had no business having sex with a minor and she had no right to do indecency in a public bathroom. If an adult wants to do homosexual or lesbian conduct with other knowing and consenting adults in their own home or apartment and not harass others about it, then it’s their life, though it’s harmful behavior. Same as if an adult wants to use tobacco in their own house or place permitted.

    But when gays or here a lesbian does it with a minor, it is criminal and must be treated as a crime. The parents did the right thing calling the police to report this sex abuse and for people to condemn and harass the parents for doing this is wrong. She again had no right to be having sex with a minor and she had no right doing it in a bathroom.

    If you think it’s bad enough that homosexuals make excuses for homosexual statutory rape, it won’t surprise you to know that even many Christians have become tolerant of homosexual/lesbian pedophiles. See this from 2013 https://forums.catholic.com/t/kaitlyn-hunt-18-charged-over-same-sex-relationship-with-15-year-old-classmate-report/327111/32 where a # of Christian posters are making excuses for lesbian Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt committing lesbian sex abuse on a 14 year old girl in a bathroom.

    In 1992, it would have been unlikely to hear people who call themselves evangelical Christians defending homosexual/lesbian pedophilia but things have changed so badly that even the Christian websites have posters defending this rubbish. World Net Daily lost credibility in that they say they’re against homosexuality/transgenderism but then the WND hires columnists such as JF Stossell, Ann Hart Coulter and Michelle Malkin who are apologists for transgenderism. Breitbart hired the homosexual pedophile apologist Milo H. Yiannopolous and we saw how the damage was done there. Breitbart and the WND do the things that they say to be against and thus don’t have credibility.

    Like

    • notChristian says:

      Thanks for replying. If WordPress deleted what you posted, then what that shows is that rather than discuss the topic, they delete things which go against their agenda. With the Panic topic, you know that I have raised the fact that most journalists and reporters are not honest when it comes to gay, lesbian and transgender (mutilated gays and lesbians)-When I read a gaybashing case in the news, (transexuals are mutilated gays/lesbians and they must abolish sex changes) I wonder what the journalist view reporting this on homosexuality/lesbianism ? I also wonder if the journalist is a homosexual or lesbian and if so, are they setting aside their bias and reporting the news with no problems ?

      Also it must be said that most journalists make excuses for the homosexual pedophile Harvey B. Milk. While most gays & lesbians are not pedophiles, gays & lesbians are more likely to support pedophilia when it’s gay/lesbian as gay groups or their friends such as Shepard Foundation’s JC Marsden, Judy L. Shepard, Big Island Chronicle Tiffany Camille Edwards Hunt, etc. also supports gay pedophile H.B. Milk incl. pushing Harvey B. Milk day on schoolkids

      You know that most journalists including World Net Daily columnists, Peter J. LaBarbera gave sympathy to the 2016 Orlando shooting victims & Peter J. LaBarbera condemned people who brought up that it’s possible that 1 or more of the Orlando victims were pedophiles, drug junkies and or drug dealers. Peter J. LaBarbera has over the years talked about homosexual pedophilia, but then Peter J. LaBarbera condemns people who raise that 1 or more of the 2016 Orlando victims were pedophiles, drug junkies and or drug dealers.

      People are offended by me saying that possibly 1 or more of the Orlando victims were pedophiles & or drug dealers. In gay/lesbian pubs-drugs like Meth, Extasy are sold as drug junkyism high among them. With pedophilia, many gays were molested as children which ruined their sexuality & some even turn out to be pedophiles. I wouldn’t be surprised if it turns out 1 or more of the Orlando victims were pedophiles & or drug dealers.

      If Peter J. LaBarbera had said that Omar S. Mateen had no right to go into a Orlando gay club and shoot so many people which killed over 40 and wounded many, even if it’s true that 1 or more of the Orlando shooting victims were pedophiles and or drug junkies or even drug dealers, that that would’ve been Okay. If it’s true that 1 or more of the Orlando shooting victims was a pedophile, drug dealer, etc., then it’s the cops job to arrest them & help the prosecutors prove they’re guilty.

      Turns out that with exceptions such as Sia’s 2016 song Greatest, the 2016 Orlando gay night club shooting victims have not usually gotten the same ‘queero worship’. Reason likely the 2016 Orlando shooting has not gotten the same coverage is because in the United States, we have had so many mass shootings before and since then, such as October 2017 Las Vegas shooting.

      Anyhow, if you have thoughts to this then please comment. Do know that with the gay topic, such as the Panic topic, etc., many Republicans have become apologists for the gay/lesbian agenda and it was an Illinois Republican Governor who signed the panic law which has language problems.

      Like

  5. notChristian says:

    Millard, see replies made to this transgender pedophile killed in Oklahoma City and how I reply to those mourning this pedophile https://www.theroot.com/after-black-trans-woman-killed-in-oklahoma-city-police-1820850785

    Here’s a comment I made to a person mourning this pedophile below. If you click pending and then click show pending, you’ll see my comments in gray. Here’s something I wrote below to a pedophile apologist SallyBanner, which you’ll see-I post under snowandcoldarefunreturns:

    snowandcoldarefunreturns (me)
    sallybanner (pedophile apologist)
    1/26/18 12:26pm
    Perhaps you want to molest children with this transgender and you mourn this pedophile because you’re a pedophile as this transgender was. Transgender people are shits. They should make it a crime to do sex change mutilations, yet people are mourning this mutilated person who likely is a pedophile.

    Like

  6. notChristian says:

    Also Millard from this https://www.theroot.com/after-black-trans-woman-killed-in-oklahoma-city-police-1820850785, you can see another reply I made below to a Poster named LoveHeals:

    PENDING APPROVAL
    snowandcoldarefunreturns (me)
    LoveHeals
    1/26/18 9:33am
    This transgender won’t be molesting anymore children, so glad the transgender is dead. Transgender people are shits. They should make it a crime to do sex change mutilations, yet people are mourning this mutilated person who likely is a pedophile.

    With violent crimes, there are more cases as mentioned of homosexuals, lesbianns and transgenders taking drugs such as Meth, Cocaine, etc. and then committing violent crimes while under their influence. But these violent crimes committed by homosexuals don’t make usually make the news as reporters usually have a pro-homosexual/lesbian and transgender bias and omit news which doesn’t agree with the journalist’s agenda.

    When I read a gay (transexuals are mutilated gays/lesbians and they must abolish sex changes) bashing case in the news, I wonder what the journalist view reporting this on homosexuality/lesbianism ? I also wonder if the journalist is a homosexual or lesbian and if so, are they setting aside their bias and reporting the news with no problems ? I do not trust news that I get from Daily Kos or the Huffington Post on their coverage of gay bashing cases because they predictably make the homosexual look like an innocent victim no matter what wrong the gay does.
    Reply

    Like

Leave a comment